Some Perennial Favorites

By Andrew Rimby

“We Two Boys Together Clinging”

WE two boys together clinging,

One the other never leaving,

Up and down the roads going, North and South excursions making,

Power enjoying, elbows stretching, fingers clutching,

Arm’d and fearless, eating, drinking, sleeping, loving,

No law less than ourselves owning, sailing, soldiering, thieving, threatening,

Misers, menials, priests alarming, air breathing, water drinking, on the turf or the sea-beach dancing,

Cities wrenching, ease scorning, statutes mocking, feebleness chasiing,

Fulfilling our foray.

-Walt Whitman, 1860

(Duncan Grant’s Bathing (1911) at the Tate Britain)

    I will always remember when I first discovered this erotic Whitman poem, and I was in my first year of my PhD studies at Stony Brook. I was looking through Whitman’s “Calamus” cluster (a section from the 1860 Leaves of Grass) to investigate what LGBTQ* literary scholarship kept highlighting: the queer erotic themes found in Whitman’s poetry. I especially became interested in how Whitman expresses love and desire between men (both younger and older) when I opened up Robert K. Martin’s Homosexual Tradition in American Poetry (1979). His landmark text (foundational for what became known as Gay and Lesbian Studies) pushed back the closet door hiding Walt Whitman, Oscar Wilde, Hart Crane, E.M. Forster, and even Allen Ginsberg. 

When I was reading “We Two Boys…,” I reread the verse “Power enjoying, elbows stretching, fingers clutching…” so many times, and remember having my ex-boyfriend listen to me recite this poem. At that moment, we were actually curled up in bed together, and life was imitating art. Although the relationship didn’t work out, I will always remember and cherish such an erotic literary memory… but back to the present moment. 

I’m usually writing these posts in my Long Island apartment where Duncan Grant’s Bathing is staring at me from the wall. Grant’s painting always brings me back to the moment when I discovered how homoerotic Whitman’s poetry is and how his verse poetically captures the feeling of being intertwined with another man (one that I still return to for this erotic feeling). Right now, I’m in my childhood bedroom at my desk (I’m visiting my parents for a short vacation), and on my bookshelf I see the Rainbow Boys series shining out like an empowering rainbow aura. I first began reading this series after I came out (this was right after I had read Andre Aciman’s Call Me By Your Name in 2008). I discovered these books, written by Alex Sánchez, at the local Barnes and Noble, and quickly read the whole series. I couldn’t believe how much the coming out storyline connected to my own experience. I credit this series with really opening my eyes to the need to seek out my high school’s Gay Straight Alliance (which I joined after I came out and found so empowering the rest of my high school journey). But, before I start to obsess over how I then found the series Queer as Folk and how I began to question the homonormative themes in these, mostly white gay male narratives (and my own fetishization of these storylines) let me sign off and leave something for the weekend’s roundtable.

(Rainbow Boys by Alex Sánchez (2001)

Mid-Week Teaser

Happy Wednesday, lovelies!

We just want to inform you that this week’s podcast will be a round table on LGBTQ* themes (duh). We’ll be talking about the books and other media that were fundamental in the development of our respective relationships with queerness, whether as insiders or as an allies, and about the persistence of homophobia in our lives and societies. 

We’re also going to try and talk a little bit about the influence HIV has had on the worlds of literature and arts. Forty years ago this very week, 5 cases of pneumonia (that turned out not just to be pneumonia) were reported to the CDC. 

It is appropriate to mark the occasion. But we will also try to have some fun and wax poetic about this and that, as we always do.

Now we thought it would improve our analytics if we included a thirst-trap in the post, so here is a picture of Baron Friedrick Wilhelm von Steuben, the gay, polyamorous (those labels would not even have existed) military leader who doesn’t get nearly enough credit for winning the American Revolution. Call me a Hessian mercenary because this Christmas present is to die for.

Seriously. Those eyes.
Courtesy of Wikipedia

June Preview-Welcome to Pride Month 2021: The Ivory Tower Boiler Room Celebrates, Reflects, and Memorializes

Book spines with different LGBTQ* Pride Flags

This month is a big deal for us. We are keeping to the established pattern–a big think every Monday, a podcast every Saturday, and shorter content in between. But leading up to this, the 52nd anniversary of the Stonewall Riots, we will be using those established patterns to reflect on our own experiences and to amplify the voices of some of our friends in art and academia. Needless to say, the theme for our Big Thinks this month will be queerness and allyship, and our podcasts will also revolve around that theme.

We have a few featured interviews:

-We will be sitting down with Ula Klein (whose book Sapphic Crossings recently came out) and Kathryn Klein (who, when not writing academic pieces, writes queer murder mysteries),

-We will also be meeting with Jason Rudy and Kate Flint, editors of the new Victorian Era Broadview Press anthology, which will have a greater focus on gender and sexuality and race studies.

-In collaboration with the Port Washington Library, we will be releasing a lecture Andrew gave last year on the genealogy of LGBTQ* Lit. and how he makes use of a queer lens in his scholarship. 

Next week we will roll out this month’s theme for the weekly Big Think: “I don’t have to wait for you to give me the key,” beginning with Andrew’s piece on June 7. Each of us will reflect on how we’re checking in this Pride Month, and the team can’t wait to share our LGBTQ* Book Corner. Each week will offer which LGBTQ* texts we’re absorbing and poring over. Currently, Andrew is loving the experience of reading James Davidson’s The Greeks and Greek Love and Brit Bennett’s The Vanishing Half (more of that discussion in his Big Think). 

Andrew also just started the third season of Pose. The amplification of LGBTQ* communities of color (especially the transgender community) in this show is important for representation, and he’ll definitely return to this discussion after he concludes this season (Billy Porter is one of his favorites, as is Mj Rodriguez). So, here’s a favorite moment in the show, when the cast gathers together to sing “Love’s In Need of Love Today” (originally sung by Stevie Wonder) to provide love, community, and care for those dying from HIV. May we all find our own caring community when we experience such hardships. 

Happy Pride,

and Happy Reading!

-Andrew, Erika, Mary, and Adam

Antivax Racists are Trying to Repurpose the Yellow Star of David

By Erika Grumet

When I was a kid, I would occasionally encounter people with numbers tattooed on their arms. I don’t remember a time when Nazis and what they had done to Jews (and by extension, my own family) weren’t a part of my consciousness. I heard the stories first hand from the survivors, in Hebrew school and in history classes. And as I grew up, I also learned more…about who was targeted, about the resistance, about the depth of the atrocities, about the little things that should have sounded alarms and about what everyday people did or didn’t do. In the time surrounding the 2016 US elections, I found myself looking at people I knew and asking if they would be willing to put their safety on the line for my life or the lives of my family-and I can’t say I was surprised by either the range of answers from “Of course, what kind of a question is that” to “you’re ridiculous, that would never happen here,” nor was I surprised by who stood on which side of the question. 

Some of the people I asked were the parents of my childrens’ friends. As a parent, I’ve worked hard to raise conscious kids. I’m proud of the job I’ve done so far, and I’ve seen my kids put those efforts into action, writing letters to politicians, speaking up at our city council meetings, asking specifically to attend events like the local Women’s March. But as a parent, I’ve also become even more vigilant about the microaggressions we experience in our lives, both in an effort to protect and to inform my own kids as well as in an effort to check my own behavior. Sometimes it’s more “aggressive” than micro; in 2013, a classmate told my kindergartener that they would “go to the Devil place for not believing in Jesus,” but it’s more often things like parent teacher conferences scheduled on Yom Kippur, or extended field trip days on Passover, or volunteer organizations scheduling required training on Rosh Hashanah. It’s living in a world where the default setting is ignorance of why Christmas is not in fact a secular holiday, no matter how much you try and make it so, or why every invocation at city council meetings doesn’t need to mention Jesus Christ, or having to explain why the high school football team cannot have a chaplain, have coach-/teacher-/volunteer-chaplain-led prayer or bible verses, why religious symbols don’t belong on banners and school spirit wear.

The microaggressions and ignorance are pervasive, and hurtful, but it becomes even more evident how far we’ve fallen in our history education when we start to see stories about businesses like this one in Nashville selling yellow patches shaped like a Mogen David proudly proclaiming one’s unvaccinated victimhood. Yellow stars, like Jewish people in Nazi occupied places were forced to wear–not something they wore voluntarily, but something they were forced to wear to identify their status as lesser than, as non-human, and not worthy of being part of society. Yellow stars that marked them for herding into ghettos, into cattle cars, into concentration camps and gas chambers. Yellow stars marking them for execution by a brutal regime that sought not to solve the major challenges of the time but to scapegoat some people and frighten others.

The store owner followed up the backlash to the patches with an Instagram post asking if people are “outraged with the tyranny the world is experiencing” and telling us that she pays more “respect to history by standing up with the fallen than offering silence and compliance.” Her response makes it clear that she is not open to learning. But maybe someone is reading this drama unfold and wants to know why these little yellow stars represent a threat as well as an insult to the safety of millions of people in this country. 

To start with, this isn’t standing up with the fallen. This is mocking the trauma, generational trauma that haunts millions of Jewish people around the world as we tell our story. She goes further and compares the expectation that in the future, unvaccinated people will be segregated from society, marked and will have to continue to wear masks, and suggesting that as things return to something resembling “normal” that in the US, you won’t be allowed to go about your business without showing “your papers.” Celebrities and ordinary people have responded, most of them indignant, calling out the abuse of this symbol, notifying companies who may be doing business with them, some of whom including major millinery companies like Brixton and Stetson, to remove their products and sever any ties they may have with the shop. Others, like Instagram have declined to even acknowledge the hate speech involved here, and some have yet to respond at all. I’m wondering when doing something for your own health as well as the health and well being of those around you became synonymous with tyranny? When did thinking of the greater good become such a burden that it should be equated with oppression? 

Why not a Hester Prynne/Scarlet Letter reference instead of a Mogen David? A scarlet U for the unvaccinated? Or red and yellow, since some people seem to be using that for COVID awareness? If the point is to identify yourself as a rebel, there are better ways to do it than to co-opt a symbol of hate and humiliation. Hester Prynne wore her A for adultery and carried her child with pride and confidence, not shame. She refused to let Puritanical society and rules dictate her behavior or how she should feel about the so-called sin she committed, remaining resistant and untamed by the cultural expectations that were trying to demand her compliance. Isn’t that the message we keep hearing about the rest of us being “sheeple” or being brainwashed? That we’re compliant instead of confident in our independence? Nazis didn’t give our Jewish families the choice to not be Jewish the way unvaccinated people are being given a choice to remain unvaccinated. We weren’t given a choice to identify or display our Jewishness or not the way someone might choose or not choose to purchase a patch or other marker identifying themself as not vaccinated. We were forced to comply and murdered whether we did or didn’t. The intent of the yellow stars was control and shame, not empowerment, pride, rebellion or independence, all values espoused by the creator of the “not vaccinated” patches.

 Just like some states in the US allow motorcyclists to operate their motorcycles only if they carry a certain amount or certain type of health insurance, people make choices that may increase the risk to themselves and those around them, but they have to compensate for it. Wearing a mask, being excluded from some places or situations, those are the costs or consequences of not being vaccinated when one is able to (obviously there are medical reasons why some people may not be able to be vaccinated, and currently there are also age restrictions on vaccination as well; those are not the situations we’re talking about here). Refusing to get vaccinated puts other people in danger. So does capriciously wearing the yellow Mogen David. It’s not surprising that the common factor in both of these actions is: people who do not value the safety and security of others, even above their own convenience.

It’s easy to feel powerless in circumstances like these, but not everyone is powerless. This sort of dangerous, race baiting nonsense is displayed by leaders in the House and Senate and elsewhere. If we hold people at the top accountable, the sense of responsibility will flow downward from them.

So where does that leave us now? This business owner will experience some consequences for her actions, whether that’s enough to cause a change in her revenue (positive or negative) and customer base (there will be people on both sides, those drawn to her because of her choices and those repulsed by those choices.) Perhaps she’ll lose her business, perhaps not. But will she learn anything? Will she come away from the experience any more aware of the harm she is causing, any more sensitive to the threat she is making? Will she better understand Anti Semitism or microaggressions? Doubtful. Will anyone learn anything? I’m not particularly hopeful about it on a grand scale. It is for that reason that we need to keep talking, especially as Shoah survivors are becoming fewer and fewer, and are no longer here to tell their stories. We cannot lose those stories to time, and must keep having the difficult conversations, calling out the aggressions, micro or not. We must keep telling the stories not because when we do, we relive or reignite our trauma, though we do that as well, but because doing so is our only weapon for the threat that ignorance and forgetfulness causes to historically oppressed and excluded groups.

I didn’t want to write this article for that very reason. When a person comes forward and says: I’ve been hurt, society doesn’t treat them well… “Snowflake,” “whiny liberal,” “sheep,” etc. But my kids are watching. As a disabled Jewish person, these become personal attacks. Your ruse to make a quick buck or to win a seat in the house of representatives does not outweigh my safety and the safety of the people around you.

Mass-Grave found in Canada Dates from only about 45 Years Ago

By Adam Katz

It gives me little pleasure to write this article, but I could not see failing to respond. Throughout most of the 20th century, Canada ran “Residential Schools” meant to deprive the aboriginal population of their culture. Yesterday, Friday, May 28, 2021, a mass grave was found beneath one of those schools.

This finding comes some six years after the conclusion of Canada’s National Truth and Reconciliation Commission, which looked into the practice of Residential Schools. Go to the website. Read the accounts. They are mystifying. Most of them are banal, and focus on the most uninteresting details, which is itself interesting. But I will quote a passage from the introduction to one of the reports:

“For children, life in these schools was lonely and alien. Buildings were poorly located, poorly built, and poorly maintained. The staff was limited in numbers, often poorly trained, and not adequately supervised. Many schools were poorly heated and poorly ventilated, and the diet was meagre and of poor quality. Discipline was harsh, and daily life was highly regimented. Aboriginal languages and cultures were demeaned and suppressed. The educational goals of the schools were limited and confused, and usually reflected a low regard for the intellectual capabilities of Aboriginal people. For the students, education and technical training too often gave way to the drudgery of doing the chores necessary to make the schools self-sustaining. Child neglect was institutionalized, and the lack of supervision created situations where students were prey to sexual and physical abusers.” (What we have Learned, Page 7).

Individual schools came and went, but the last of these residential schools closed in 1996; as of 1964, an estimated 75% of school-age Inuit children were in these schools. Justin Trudeau, who is recorded by the Reuters article multiple times as saying all the right things and tut-tutting with the appropriate amount of sympathy, called the incident: “a painful reminder of that dark and shameful chapter of our country’s history.” But Trudeau was 25 when the practice ended. His father, Pierre Trudeau, was an MP, and much else, while this practice was going on. Justin Trudeau’s attempt at sympathy, in historical terms, is like a person whose house is a wreck, referring to last night’s debauch as “a chapter of my history.” Something that happened this recently is not a previous chapter; you are still living in the selfsame dark chapter, and the only way forward is to make amends for it. Based on his sympathetic sweet nothings yesterday, it would surely come as a suprise that Trudeau fils himself led the effort to delay reparations for as long as possible (ibid), as well as how angry the First American leaders have been at Canada’s response to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

25 years is not a long time. The whole genocide is so recent that this grave, situated near a school that closed in 1978, was known to the first Americans who lived there. This grave was not discovered; the people who knew about it told the people in power and the latter finally listened. How many of the teachers who perpetrated “cultural genocide” are still alive and perhaps still teaching? What are they teaching? How many government- and church-officials are still in charge of something, anything? What form of justice was done for victims and perpetrators alike? And what of those who dragged their feet when called on to make reparations?

Institutional transparency is a massive responsibility. Justice for those who cannot protect themselves is a massive responsibility. But we are not out of these woods yet. I don’t expect to find a mass-grave beneath any American school based on practices that are currently enforced, but under a U.S.-run facility overseas? Under a U.S. prison or ICE facility? We have evidence that similar practices are rather the norm than the exception. In any case, there are other abuses than death by privation.

The good thing about a Truth and Reconciliation Commission such as Canada has enacted, and such as the United States desperately needs–one for slavery and segregation, one for immigration, one for Native American genocide, and one for the prisons, and those may just be for starters–is that it’s harder for the responsible parties to hide. When your own government produces a document accusing itself of “a coherent policy to eliminate Aboriginal people as distinct peoples and to assimilate them into the Canadian mainstream against their will,” it becomes harder to dither over making restitution. But they are managing to.

The lessons in all of this:

-Democracies can be just as brutal as authoritarian governments; as long as they can find a legal loophole. Be very careful when your government tells you that someone doesn’t belong–Uighurs in China, First Americans in Canada, immigrants in the United States… “doesn’t belong” is code for “we can hurt them with impunity.

-The responsibility of rectifying a bad system rests on all of us. Spread the word; talk about these issues at the dinner-table. Join people who have plans.

-Listen to people. The people whose children were in that mass-grave knew approximately where it was. They knew it was there. So why are we only finding out now? Because nobody listened. Problems get bigger when nobody listens.

(Podcast Episode) This Episode Contains Multitudes

Who has done his day’s work? who will soonest be through with his supper?
Who wishes to walk with me?

(From Walt Whitman’s “Song of Myself”)

Now that you are done with your day’s work…or perhaps you’re planning to listen while you work, we are happy to bring you this week’s episode honoring the 202nd birthday of Walt Whitman, in partnership with the Walt Whitman Initiative and we are grateful for their support.



If you’re looking for more information about Walt Whitman, and his place in American literature, Andrew, our resident Whitman scholar has provided the following recommendations:

“Walt Whitman, Racism, and American Literature: Matt Miller and Lavelle Porter”

The Walt Whitman Initiative:

“Robust American Love Series” on YouTube:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCG8PV-Q1rU-SexyUYoxjGFA?view_as=subscriber

Lavelle Porter’s “Should Walt Whitman Be #Cancelled?”:

Andrew Rimby’s “Talking Back to Walt Whitman Using a Queer of Color Framework, VoiceThreads, and Virtual Walking ToursNineteenth-Century Gender Studies (Issue 17.1, Spring 2021):

http://ncgsjournal.com/issue171/rimby.html

“For Queen Victoria’s Birthday”: https://whitmanarchive.org/published/periodical/poems/per.00145.html

Happy 202nd Birthday, Walt Whitman

By Andrew Rimby

The Ivory Tower Boiler Room is full of Whitmanic energy as we celebrate Whitman’s 202nd birthday on May 31st! As I (Andrew) am writing this, I’m currently visiting my family in South Jersey and am about 15 minutes away from Whitman’s family tomb in Harleigh Cemetery (in Camden, see below).

Walt Whitman’s final resting place, a crypt he designed, in Camden.

While I grew up where Whitman spent the last part of his life, I now reside in Suffolk County, Long Island (not too far from where Whitman was born, in West Hills, NY). And, this is a birthday celebration so let’s move from death to life with an image of Whitman’s birth home (thank you Walt Whitman Birthplace for this image, see below).

The home where Walt Whitman was born. Photo courtesy of the Walt Whitman Birthplace.

When Whitman writes, in “Song of Myself,” that he “contains multitudes,” the Ivory Tower team relates to this and grew up surrounded by Whitman’s aura (Andrew and Mary are from South Jersey and Adam and Erika are from Long Island). Before our birthday special comes out on Saturday, we want to share with you previous episodes that featured discussions on Whitman, including the following:

“Welcome to the Ivory Tower Boiler Room” (our first episode where Adam and Andrew discuss all things Whitman and Renaissance Lit

“Starting from Paumanok with Caitlyn Shea” (our two part discussion about Caitlyn’s role as the Events and Media Director of the Whitman Birthplace)

“Freed Verse: A Conversation on Academia and Public Engagement with Dr. Karen Karbiener” (we discuss Karen’s pedagogy and public scholarship on Walt Whitman and her role as the Director of the Walt Whitman Initiative)

Both Erika and I are obsessed with the Fame movie and always think of Whitman when listening to the climactic final song of the film, “I Sing the Body Electric” (an allusion to Whitman’s 1855 poem). If you’ve never watched the scene in Fame, we highly recommend it (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vh-sUhHBoU), and of course, you should read the Whitman poem (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vh-sUhHBoU). 

To celebrate Whitman’s birthday, we’ll be featuring our first partnership with the Walt Whitman Initiative, where you’ll hear “Walt Whitman, Racism, and American Literature” a discussion with Matt Miller and Lavelle Porter (two 19th-century American Lit. scholars). This talk kicked off the Whitman Initiative’s “Robust American Love Series” on August 13, 2020, and we can’t wait for all of you to hear this timely and urgent discussion. After you listen to our birthday episode, head on over to the Whitman Initiative’s website (https://waltwhitmaninitiative.org/) to check out the 18th Annual “Song of Myself” marathon (happening on June 6th). Our previous guest, Caitlyn Shea won the poster award for the marathon so please check out her interpretation of Whitman (see below). I recently learned that both Rosanne Cash and Lenny Kaye (Patti Smith’s guitarist) will be featured readers during the “Song of Myself” marathon so that’s pretty awesome! 

From our partners at the Walt Whitman Initiative

When wrapping up this Whitman birthday celebratory blog post, I was discussing with Mary (who was with me at Endgrain Coffee Roasters, a really comfy cafe in Pitman) that Whitman’s presence is always around us. Patti Smith spent a short time in Pitman, and a couple, sitting next to us outside, while drinking their coffee explained the history of Patti Smith in Pitman (who coincidentally rented an apartment from the woman we had just met). The conversation quickly turned to Whitman (who is always lingering in the air). Not only did the woman know Patti Smith, but her great-grandfather skipped school, on the day of Whitman’s burial in Harleigh Cemetery, and as she narrated, he hid in a tree and watched as Whitman was laid to rest in his tomb. Whitman would have been thrilled with this moment in Pitman where his legacy lives on in a story that combines realism and folklore. And on that note, we want to end with Patti Smith’s “People Have the Power” that she sang for Whitman’s 200th Birthday (in 2019) in Center City, Philadelphia. 

Andrew and Mary at the coffee shop.

Quick Note for our Readers

We have been watching the analytics with some amusement:

-observing a spike in readership from Germany and a lesser one from India.

-Es macht uns Freude, immer mehr Leser in Deutschland zu sehen. Wir hoffen, dass Sie unseren Blog mit Ihren Freunden teilen und weiterhin lesen und kommentieren.

-a few readers here and there from every continent north of Antarctica.

-casi cada día, un lector de Ecuador. Debe ser el mismo lector cada vez, ¿qué no? La situación alternativa seria muy coincidencia, nos parece.

In short, we made this blog to connect with our readers and we feel all the gratitude and challenge of our audience being so far away from us. But it doesn’t need to be that way. Okay, we are not going to share a primary language, nor, perhaps, favorite foods, nor are we going to be able to use each other’s plugs and power outlets without one of those adapters (sorry those things are just abominable. What were we talking about?). But you CAN reach out to us. Let us know you’re there. Just drop us a line to say hi. Let us know what we can do for you. Let us know if you want to write a guest-spot on our blog.

Just a few weeks ago we had a guy send us an email out of the blue from Greece, asking us to include him on an episode of the podcast. What did we do? We listened to his story, determined that he was exactly the sort of person we wanted to feature, and booked him. Simple as that. Let us know if you want that to be you.

Happy Reading,

Adam, Andrew, Erika, Mary, and now Tiffany

Whitman’s Thrush

Walt Whitman at 202

By Adam Katz

I guess most school-age kids read “O Captain, my Captain” at some point. Looking back at it now, it’s a poem you have to read quickly, I think. The line “O heart! heart! heart! / O the bleeding drops of red” does not really admit slowing down and analyzing. But like so many things Whitman writes, the line is musical, and most music sounds ridiculous when played at the wrong tempo. If all I got from that poem is the fact that it is fun to read out loud, that is enough.

    Fast forward to college; junior year, in fact. I took a class called “The American Long Poem,” which, frankly, was a revelation. Not only did it kindle a lifelong love of Hart Crane and a deep respect for Gwendolyn Brooks, but it was my first time through Song of Myself, and, perhaps more importantly, my first time through “When Lilacs Last in the Dooryard Bloomed.” I had been a friend of the Beat poets since high school, so Whitman’s sensuality did not exactly scandalize me. But there is something to be said for doing a thing just right. Whitman, to me, is different from most other poets in the English language. The length of the line is calibrated to the length of the human breath; the density of the line appears calibrated to Whitman’s understanding of how people think, at what rate people are likely to process what they read or recite. The result is that I feel more at home in my body when I am reciting Whitman than doing most other things. Just the feeling of the air entering and leaving my body—a feeling I am never more aware of than when I’m reading poetry out loud—can be an experience of such electricity and intimacy as would take a lifetime to parse just for my own understanding, and another lifetime to describe to someone else.

    Reading “When Lilacs Last,” especially out loud, is something else. The first four stanzas barely connect to each other: the first is about the sunset, or perhaps the evening star; the second is about the lilacs; the third, about a thrush singing from its home in the swamp; and the fourth is about Lincoln’s coffin (though Lincoln is never named) traveling around the country so people could pay their respects. An initial thought is how deeply grounded these images are in personal experience. Being from the same area as Whitman, there are lilacs not 25 feet from where I write these lines. They are spectacular… while they last, which is, fittingly, not long. Like a sonata announcing its separate themes at the beginning of the piece—no, more like a concerto grosso by Bach, or a jazz combo, we see these four soloists onstage at the beginning of the piece—star, branch, bird, bier—but we don’t know whose voice will soar above the rest. The themes feel as if they are simultaneously harmonizing and competing. Some of the stanzas are short and poignant:

Sing on there in the swamp,
O singer bashful and tender, I hear your notes, I hear your call,
I hear, I come presently, I understand you,
But a moment I linger, for the lustrous star has detain’d me,
The star my departing comrade holds and detains me.

While some of the stanzas are long and free. The bird in particular seems to favor short passages that have their say in the fewest possible words. Until…

Come lovely and soothing death,Undulate round the world, serenely arriving, arriving,
In the day, in the night, to all, to each,
Sooner or later delicate death.
Prais’d be the fathomless universe,
For life and joy, and for objects and knowledge curious,
And for love, sweet love—but praise! praise! praise!
For the sure-enwinding arms of cool-enfolding death.
Dark mother always gliding near with soft feet,
Have none chanted for thee a chant of fullest welcome?
Then I chant it for thee, I glorify thee above all,
I bring thee a song that when thou must indeed come, come unfalteringly.
Approach strong deliveress,
When it is so, when thou hast taken them I joyously sing the dead,
Lost in the loving floating ocean of thee,
Laved in the flood of thy bliss O death.
From me to thee glad serenades,
Dances for thee I propose saluting thee, adornments and feastings for thee,
And the sights of the open landscape and the high-spread sky are fitting,
And life and the fields, and the huge and thoughtful night.
The night in silence under many a star,
The ocean shore and the husky whispering wave whose voice I know,
And the soul turning to thee O vast and well-veil’d death,
And the body gratefully nestling close to thee.
Over the tree-tops I float thee a song,
Over the rising and sinking waves, over the myriad fields and the prairies wide,
Over the dense-pack’d cities all and the teeming wharves and ways,
I float this carol with joy, with joy to thee O death.

All I can say is: you have to try it out loud. I’m not someone who enjoys death. I never had a proper goth phase. It wasn’t until long after I fell in love with this poem for its own sake that I came to terms with the fact that death is in every piece of writing. So no, I wasn’t looking for a poem about death to obsess over, but I got one, because there is something about a poet who just gets it absolutely right—no matter what it is. When Whitman’s thrush transcends death in this moment, we all do, if only for a moment. The only passage I can think of that is comparable in its beauty, specifically in its ability to transform the dread of death into something joyful and creative and sustaining, is this one:

Come, night, come, Romeo, come, thou day in night;
For thou wilt lie upon the wings of night
Whiter than new snow on a raven’s back.
Come, gentle night, come, loving, black-brow’d night,
Give me my Romeo; and, when a’ shall die,
Take him and cut him out in little stars,
And he will make the face of heaven so fine
That all the world will be in love with night
And pay no worship to the garish sun.

I would wager Whitman learned his craft from passages like this one. Both passages have the same fussy preoccupation with an image that doesn’t come off as fussy in recital; they come off as building image upon image, piece upon piece; musical and ecstatic and affectionate and grief-stricken all at once.

Maybe I’m repeating myself (if so, Whitman would approve) but it’s good to read poetry, particularly out loud. Reading a good poem out loud is like taking a good bath; like falling asleep and waking up by someone’s side; like eating just the right amount of something that was cooked just right. It’s an experience that involves the whole body. Something that never ceases to amaze me about Whitman is how sensuality, for him, is at once something serious and something playful, maybe because everything is at least potentially sensuous to him, and sensuality is always in dialogue with death.

I don’t know why I let him in all those years ago, but Whitman was the first poet who was able to get through to me in my haze of untreated anxiety and other issues and say: look around you; don’t take any of this for granted, because even though this is all you get, it’s enough. 

End of Semester Blues and Varsity Blues

By Tiffany Sowa

I’ve been working on the closing of a seasonal chapter here in the middle of the midwest. I spent the week grading spring semester final papers and final exams in fits and starts, since the last day of classes was Friday and final grades were due Monday. The two days in between were spent attending my daughter’s graduation with her bachelor’s in art and psychology (she plans to be an art therapist, eventually) and then celebrating that accomplishment, so it behooved me to grade anything that was submitted by my students at the moment it was submitted instead of leaving it all for Monday morning. Fortunately, this tactic worked – I managed to submit grades 24 hours before the deadline…only to have an email at 7:30pm on Sunday night (during our grad party) from a student asking if they could still turn in their final research paper. Yikes.

What is it about students and procrastination? I’m not by any means a non-procrastinator and I know several artists of all varieties who tend to do the same, so naturally I assume it is an inborn trait of most creative people. We’re not lazy, we just work better under enormous time constraints and looming deadlines we put on ourselves that send our stress levels to DEFCON 1. It’s all part of the “tortured artist” persona. 

But, students? I repeatedly reminded them for two weeks…”last day to submit is Friday”…”Friday is the last day! No refunds, no returns! Get your work turned in!” so it’s not like they weren’t aware. I’m pretty sure they can’t all possibly be artistic by nature. I have just as many math and science majors as I do liberal arts majors in the average Comp I class. So what gives? Is it age? Maturity? Indifference?

I’m not suggesting I have the answer. I will look forward to reading the comments section for enlightenment. I’m just here to complain about the stragglers.

In my spare moments I have been previewing approximately 20 different books that in some way evaluate equity in higher education among marginalized groups, which then dovetails into Ivy League elitism and the myth of meritocracy. This interest stems from my doctoral thesis statement. My program doesn’t begin until the Fall semester of 2021, but I am getting a jump start on the research by reading samples on my Kindle of numerous books. As loathed as Amazon is currently, I find it immensely helpful for this type of “browsing” because the algorithms suggest scads of books related to my search, and I happily fall down the rabbit hold of “Download Sample ” Wonderland. At the top of my current list currently are:

Paying for the Party by Elizabeth A. Armstrong and Laura T. Hamilton

Academically Adrift by Richard Arum and Josipa Roksa

The Inequality Machine by Paul Tough

Broke by Laura T. Hamilton and Kelly Nielsen

(I just realized Laura Hamilton is on this list twice, so I’ll have to look for more of her books)

The Hidden Curriculum by Rachel Gable

Austerity Blues by Michael Fabricant and Stephen Brier

There are 12 more in the TBR (to-be-read) pile, including the book that started it all, The Merit Myth by Anthony Carnevale, Peter Schmidt, and Jeff Strohl. I picked up this physical book a few months ago knowing vaguely what I was searching for but not really knowing where to begin. I got lucky. 

From the introduction:

“…colleges should do more than groom successive generations of governing elite. They should prepare student bodies that look like America for participation in a diverse civil society and equip them to reject authoritarian thinking that presumes one race, one faith, one leader, and one way of life.”

Ahh, yes. I remember now. My search stemmed from the feeling that education had finally, publicly and humiliatingly, failed us in 2016 and I wanted to know the why. What the heck happened, and how the heck do we fix it? I needed to know if it might happen again, and how we could possibly avoid it.

If you’re still unclear about what “failure” I’m talking about, I’ll be happy to take your questions in the comments. I’ll also be talking more about equity in higher ed among marginalized groups in other blog posts, but for now, I’ll just say that Georgia recently saved the entire U.S. of A. from the complete collapse of democracy as we know it, and we can’t allow ourselves to get that close to a dictatorship ever, ever again. I believe education is the answer, but only if it is accessible to everyone.

Until next time, keep reading.